Jambunathan K <kjambunat...@gmail.com> writes: > Dan Davison <davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk> writes: > > [Warning: OT] > >> tangling is not (technically at least) an Org-mode export method. > > This is an implementation artefact (as you have noted). > >>From a user-perspective tangling is a specialized form of export.
I think I agree with that. I wonder if it would be helpful to more formally recognise tangling as a form of export. For example, in one of the other threads, you were talking about selective tangling. If tangling were treated as a form of export, presumably that would mean that tangling would obey the tag-based selective export mechanisms (variables org-export-select-tags and org-export-exclude-tags), and also that #+INCLUDE would have the semantics expected by the OP. [...] > May be in coming days I should be able to make concrete, code-level > suggestions on that would take my prayers further down in your altar > :-). I've certainly read your recent series of emails and the resulting discussion. But of course time is the major limiting factor, and I haven't yet managed to properly get my head round the various ideas that have been discussed. Would you be able to provide a brief summary of the series of emails? If you could identify one or a few core proposal(s) and be explicit about exactly what changes in behaviour you're suggesting, and whether they would be backwards compatible, that could be very helpful. Dan > > Meanwhile I invite you to give my posts some thought ... Dan or Eric > could churn out babel code faster and more effectively than I could > possibly could. > > Jambunathan K. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
