Sébastien Vauban wrote: >Hi Bastien, >Bastien wrote: >> Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: >> >>> Though I had something in mind, that's effectively not expressed above: I'd >>> like to get that date in the Org format, so that I can use it as a proper >>> Org timestamp in entries: >>> >>> * TODO Answer mail of Bastien >>> [2010-09-20 Mon 00:13] >>> >>> Would that request be feasible and accepted by you? >> >> You can now use %:org-date for Gnus links on messages. Slight difference >> with your proposal, the output is of the form: >> >> <2010-09-20 Mon 00:13>
>Didn't think of the active version. But is it too much asking for the version >I searched for? Could we name it differently maybe? >Or do you consider that too much of a mess, and useless? I've started to implement the :date property for the other mailers and thought about: - date :: literal content of the date header field - date-timestamp :: active timestamp for the date header field - date-timestamp-ia :: inactive timestamp for the date header field Best, -- David -- OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmj...@jabber.org Email..... dm...@ictsoc.de
pgpUfEHJjvZtT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
