Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes: > Dan Davison <davi...@stats.ox.ac.uk> writes: >> OK, so we're agreed. But your points below don't seem to describe a less >> technical route. Could you describe the less technical version of the >> instructions for the method that you are advocating? > > Installing is something technical and I'm a tech-head, so you're asking > something of me I'm not really qualified to do. :-) > > My points were: > > - I think that a proper installation via make is the way to go, but I > recognize that some folks don't want or need to do that. > > - There is a default place where Emacs expects this kind of stuff and > has some magic implemented to make it work without further > configuration, and that place is site-lisp. You can put it someplace > else, but then you have to alter the load-path or you are at the mercy > of some special configuration to make the same magic work in other > places, too (I've had ~/lisp set up that way when I was still > compiling Emacs myself). > > - If org was delivered and compiled in 'org/' rather than 'lisp/', one > could instruct users to just take that folder and copy/drag it into > the site-lisp directory of their Emacs installation. You can do that > with the lisp folder, but I'd at least tell people to please rename it > to org after doing the copy. > > If you want to get any less technical than that, I'd suggest ELPA or > something like it (as has been discussed already in another thread). > ELPA packages build and configure themselves as far as possible, so that > should take out the guesswork for novice users. Also it looks like it > will come standard with Emacs24 (with a GNU archive and the possibility > to add additional archives, which could take care of the "bleeding > edge"), so there will be absolutely no "installation" work required from > the user from then on.
Hi Achim, Thanks, that was very helpful. Using ELPA does seem like an attractive route, especially if it (package.el) is going to be in Emacs24. - How much work would it take to put and maintain Org-mode on ELPA? - Would it make sense to have two different packages available via ELPA, i.e. Latest Release and Latest? - Will it be possible for the Org project to have control over the files that ELPA points at (in which case we might be able to keep the latest updated a few times a day or something), or do we have to submit them to a server that's out of our control? - Will ELPA be able to get the info files installed suitably? Dan > > > Regards, > Achim. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode