Charles Philip Chan <cpc...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > > > It is not just one file and afaik, *none* of it is written in > > Perl. Some of it is C, some of it is TeX, some of it is Java > > (apparently: I haven't looked at tex4ht for some years and I don't > > remember any Java in there before, but there is some now), a large > > amount is just text config files. > > I didn't take a look at the code, but mk4ht is written in perl: > > ,---- > | ls -la /usr/share/texmf/bin/noarch/mk4ht > | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 47 2010-09-07 02:10 /usr/share/texmf/bin/noarch/mk= > 4ht -> ../../../../share/texmf/scripts/tex4ht/mk4ht.pl > `---- > Oh, OK, I stand corrected: there is *one* Perl file in there. The rest is as I described it, except that there's also a ton of shell scripts. This in particular is perhaps a little worrisome for Win32, unless one is running cygwin. Not sure whether Vitton's notes address this. In any case, without much supporting evidence[1], I'd say that if you are trying to get to OpenOffice this way, the road is probably paved with thorns. Nick [1] I just tried a simple org->latex->oo transformation on Ubuntu 8.10, with the default tex4ht distribution for this platform that synaptic gave me: I tried for a few minutes without success. But I am a complete ignoramus as far as OO goes, so it may very well have been my error. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode