Jeff Horn <jrhorn...@gmail.com> writes: > I used scheduling to put all such items in my agenda, and I also > tagged them as todo's or appointments. I just mark them as done and > they're automatically rescheduled. No scheduler multiplier shows up as > long as I stay on top of marking the items as done. > > I didn't realize notes with an active timestamp would be included in > the agenda. It makes sense, and nowhere in the manual mentioned a note > having to have a TODO keyword to show up... I just sort of imposed the > structure on my file. > > I think I'll drop the TODO keywords from these sorts of items. > > My question is, will headings with TODO keywords and an active > timestamp show up, even /without/ scheduling?
Yes (as you have noted). Anything with an active timestamp (SCHEDULED, DEADLINE, and appointments) will show up in the agenda. Each type, however, has a different behavior. There is an FAQ on this: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.php#scheduled-vs-deadline-vs-timestamp Best, Matt > > (And I realized I could easily answer my own question. Posting here > for posterity.) > > The answer is yes. But if one is going to all the trouble of a TODO > keyword (which enables nifty features like logging, so I can tell when > a class was cancelled by using "DEFER" instead of "DONE"), one might > as well use scheduling, too. Only if you don't want to keep track of > marking items as done should one drop scheduling and keywords. > _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
