Tassilo Horn <tass...@member.fsf.org> wrote:
> > BTW suggest to replace the common footnote by the org's footnotes, remove > > the > > prefix then, leave some aliases in org-mode for backward-compatibility. > > Well, I don't have a strong opinion on that. But currently > org-footnote.el is not very good when writing mails, because it places > footnotes at the end of a buffer. If there's a signature, then > footnotes are in that and likely to be removed by people replying to > your mail. > How does footnote.el find the signature? I assumed before that signatures are free-form and therefore unfindable algorithmically, but that seems to be a mistake on my part. If that's the case, the mechanism can be grafted into org-footnote.el, perhaps with an expanded meaning of org-footnote-placement: in addition to nil or a string, it can be a symbol, say 'before-signature, and that can be set in an appropriate mail composition hook. Nick _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
