On Dec 14, 2010 8:47am, Rainer M Krug <rmk...@gmail.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/14/2010 02:34 PM, Jonathan BISSON wrote:
> Jeff Horn gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I think what Chris was referring to is the fact that you can write
>> literate programs using org-mode and org-babel. You can mix
>> documentation and code, and then run some nifty functions that
>> separate them out. The advantage, of course, is that your source is
>> self-documenting.
>>
> Yes, but an org file with babel is not python native. So I needed for one
> of my projects an orgmode translator that is totally python native.
> org-babel is nice for orgfiles doing computations but not for software
> development.
What about tangling? When you tangle your org file, you get a source
file for that language.
Tangling is what I had in mind for my comment. It seems like an easy way to have literate programming...
Chris
_______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
