Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: > Hi Eric, > > "Eric Schulte" wrote: >> I've just pushed up a new header argument combination ":comments noweb" >> which will wrap all embedded noweb sections in link comments, as >> demonstrated in the following example. Hopefully this should be >> sufficient for a complete mapping from a pure code file back to the >> original org-mode file. > > If I understand correctly, this is some sort of enhancement to the ":comments > yes" option. > > If yes, is there a reason to have both values, with subtle differences? > Shouldn't we port the behavior of ":comments noweb" to the ":comments yes" > value? >
Yes, the reason to retain both variants is that in the case of short noweb references embedded in a single line, e.g. #+source: first #+begin_src ruby 5 #+end_src #+begin_src ruby :noweb yes <<first>> + 6 #+end_src the yes option would be preferable, as the insertion of comments around the noweb reference would result in adding line breaks around the reference and possibly breaking new-line sensitive code. Cheers -- Eric > > Best regards, > Seb _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
