Manuel Giraud <manuel.gir...@univ-nantes.fr> writes:

> Bastien <bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr> writes:
>
>> Would people welcome such a simplification?
>
> I've tried it and find it better (and simpler) then with
> :auto-preamble/:preamble.

Thanks for the feedback!

> Some comments:
>
>      + example in info file is not the same as before because postamble
>        is on by default (maybe we could put a formated string as example
>        here)

I'll put two examples, one with :html-preamble t and another one with
:html-postamble using a format string.

As for org-export-html-preamble and -postamble being t by default, it's 
a mistake I made.  I think they should default to nil.  But I'd welcome 
another opinion!

>      + I was confused by /html/ in :html-preamble but since only html
>        exports use it I guess that makes sense.

Yes, I think it clarifies things.

-- 
 Bastien

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to