Hi Ethan, Ethan Glasser-Camp <gla...@cs.rpi.edu> writes:
> I've been playing with the HTML export and it's pretty cool. I just have > one quibble, which is that footnotes are always put at the end of the > document. I'd like them to be at the end of each item, which is where I put > them in my org file -- i.e. I've set org-footnote-section to nil. > > I poked around in the code and it looks like the footnotes are being > normalized, and the normalization function is putting them all at the end > of the document. Normalization is necessary for the names of footnotes, but > I think it is too aggressive about moving footnotes. I agree. > Are there exporters for which collecting footnotes in one place is > necessary? I think org-export-as-html could handle keeping the > footnotes where they are with minimal changes. > > Attached is a sketchy patch that does what I want. It's an ugly hack. What > do you think? I tested the patch and it does what you want, thanks for it. It doesn't break footnotes export in LaTeX (good thing!). I didn't test for other exporters. However, it seems to me that org-footnote-normalize does the right thing when putting every footnotes at a single place -- at least, there should be a footnote section, even when footnotes live within a subtree. It'll make life easier for exporter. If you don't mind, I first want to do some work on the generic exporter to decide how to implement your idea. Thanks! -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
