Andrew J. Korty <a...@iu.edu> wrote: > Alan L Tyree <alanty...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm purely a user, but I would not be in favour of splitting the list. > > I find it interesting to have an insight into what the developers are > > doing, where org is headed. Use of a DEV tag would be good. > > I don't understand. If you like to read the development posts, why not > subscribe to both lists? My concerns with a DEV tag are twofold: people > would forget to add it, and it clutters the subject line. >
Agreed. > Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > The thing that is most difficult for me is the fact that I almost > > never can read the entire subject header. Often I get to read only > > the first word. Tags will make that worse. > > It was suggested once that we shorten the [Orgmode] tag to [Org]. That > seems like a change everyone can agree with. Could one of the mailing > list admins please make that change? > Agreed - even though I was probably the most vocal opponent of dropping the tag altogether, I have no problem with making it shorter. [Org] looks fine for the current list and if the dev list comes to pass it could perhaps get an [OrgD] tag (or even [OD]: overdosing on org is a good thing...) Thanks, Nick _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode