Hi Bastien,
Bastien wrote:
> Sébastien Vauban <[email protected]> writes:
>> Is it because of some order to respect in the different allowed timestamps
>> (active, inactive, scheduled, deadline)
>
> Yes, SCHEDULED (or DEADLINE) should come first.
OK. I did not think that mattered much, but that's no problem.
> In general, I tend to avoid mixing several timestamps format for the same
> entry (I just allow myself to use both SCHEDULED and DEADLINE, since that
> makes sense.)
I almost never mix many dates, but this comes from the following "need": I
capture emails I have to respond to, and
- I want the original date to be saved, and
- add my SCHEDULED timestamp onto it.
This is done with the following template (in which I just inversed the two
lines containing dates):
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
("m" "Mail" entry
(file+headline ,org-default-notes-file "Tasks")
"* TODO %:subject%? (from %:fromname) :mail:
SCHEDULED: %t
%:date-timestamp-inactive
#+begin_verse
%i
#+end_verse
>From %a"
:empty-lines 1 :immediate-finish)
#+end_src
You'll tell me that I could use PROPERTIES as well, but I think I'd loose the
ability to sort the tasks tree based on the inactive dates.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sébastien Vauban
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
