Nicolas <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > It is true that the patch only solves the problem if it would happen > with auto-fill (or fill-paragraph). On the other hand, if the original > writer typed it that way, it's an user problem, and I don't think we > should add cruft to solve it.
FWIW, I wrote the original text and can confirm that it resulted from calling fill-paragraph. Best, Matt
