On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Matt Lundin <m...@imapmail.org> wrote: > I'm not too familiar with invoking sexp expansion within capture > templates and am not sure whether you can expand an item within a sexp.
It does work, sort of. My function is of the form: if path matches regexp return complicated link construction else return "[[file:" + path + "]]" What happens is that when called with the expanded %F the matching always fails so the "else" branch is always taken. When called from evaluated lisp code (e.g. (linkify "foo/bar")), the function works correctly. > I imagine other community members might have some ideas. (I'm Cc'ing the > ML on this reply.) Doh! Most ML's have the reply-to set to default to the list. I didn't check to TO; I'd intended my reply to go to the ML as well. > Would the following work, or do you require something more complex? > > ("c" "Clock sibling" item (clock) "%T %a") I require something more complex. Our code repository has a pretty nifty web interface with a lot of very useful features. What I'm trying to do is arrange that if the file that I was working on when I created the note is from the source repository, I create a link to the web interface's rendition of the file, rather than to the file on the file system. If the file isn't from the code repository then I just create an ordinary file link. Thanks, -- Shawn