At Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:56:51 -0400, Nick Dokos wrote: > Indeed: it would require a bit of refactoring of Simon's code to provide the > function(s) to apply to each entry, and changes to the top level functions to > use the mapping API instead of looping explicitly.
That sounds like a good idea. I may at some stage want to exclude counting certain trees, and then I may have another look at this if someone else hasn't already done it. But for now, time pressure dictates I stop hacking on my word count function. cheers, Simon
