Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote:
> On 5/9/11 May 9 -9:54 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> > Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote:
> >
> >> There is the following code block there:
> >>
> >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
> >> (add-to-list 'org-export-latex-classes
> >> '("per-file-class"
> >> "\\documentclass{scrartcl}
> >> [NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES]
> >> [EXTRA]"
> >> ("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}")
> >> ("\\subsection{%s}" . "\\subsection*{%s}")
> >> ("\\subsubsection{%s}" . "\\subsubsection*{%s}")
> >> ("\\paragraph{%s}" . "\\paragraph*{%s}")
> >> ("\\subparagraph{%s}" . "\\subparagraph*{%s}")))
> >> #+end_src
> >>
> >> Is this still correct? Or should this be :exports none instead of
> >> :results silent?
> >>
> >
> > ``:results silent'' works for me and keeps the result from appearing in
> > the org buffer. I don't think :exports can do that - it can only affect
> > what's exported.
> >
> > Nick
>
> I must be doing something wrong then --- I had the :results silent and
> found the source block in verbatim in my latex export file.... Changing
> to :exports none made that go away for me. Maybe that was a
> coincidence. I will have to investigate further, I guess.
>
No, you are not doing anything wrong: the default :exports value is
"code", so the code ends up in your export. ``:exports none'' keeps it
(and any results) from being exported.
OTOH, try evaluating (C-c C-c) the code block, with and without
``:results silent''. There is a behavior difference and *that* difference
is not affected by how you set :exports.
Nick
