Hello Karl, Karl Voit <devn...@karl-voit.at> writes:
> Sorry when I disagree for one case: > > When I change each entry in my test data using «C-c .» and clicking > on 1st of July ... > > ,----[ test data ] > | <2011-06-28 Tue> > | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w> > | <2011-06-28 Tue -1d> > | <2011-06-28 Tue +1w -1d> > `---- > > ... I end up having this: > > ,----[ result ] > | <2011-07-01 Fri> > | <2011-07-01 Fri +1w> > | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d> > | <2011-07-01 Fri -1d> > `---- > > In the last case, the repeater gets lost :-( I cannot reproduce this. Note that if you use the warning _before_ the repeater, then it gets losts: <2011-06-28 Tue -1d +1w> That because the warning should always be _after_ the repeater: See section 8.3.2 "Repeated tasks" in the manual "the repeater should come first and the warning period last: `DEADLINE: <2005-10-01 Sat +1m -3d>'." HTH, -- Bastien
