Hi > > If Shelagh hasn't actually authored any of ob-lilypond.el (or at least > hasn't authored more than 10 lines of) then we could simply remove her > name from the authors list and include it into the Org-mode core. This > however may not be the best long-term solution if you anticipate her > increased participation later-on in the project. Please let me know > (soon) if you would like me to make this change. >
I've modified the author status in my repository. > Ultimately this points to the more general issue of how to include Babel > language-specific tests into the Org-mode test suite s.t. they can be > executed independently of the core of the test suite. > > Thanks -- Eric > My unit-tests don't currently require the Lilypond to be initialised "as a babel language" nor a Lilypond executable AFAICT, so currently they possibly don't need to be run "independently". I'll investigate this further. > > One distinction that has occurred to me (especially following comments on the mailing list) is that of "babel language" and "babel language work-flow". In other words, I can visualise refactoring ob-lilypond to be no more than a specification of the Lilypond syntax, and working in parallel, on a work-flow implementation for Lilypond that is "opinionated" in terms of adjusting org-babel settings away from their defaults / removing work-flow noise etc. ( org-lilypond.el ) ? Would this make sense, and if so where would it live (aligned to org-babel / a native Emacs mode perhaps)? I hope that makes sense. Regards Martyn
