MidLifeXis at PerlMonks <midlife...@wightmanfam.org> writes: > I tested this again over the weekend, and finally understood what you were > saying. > > I put a > > #+resname: blah > : blahcontent > > and then I can use <<blah()>> to get "blahcontent" replaced without keeping > the newlines. > > Is this "abusing" resname, or is it a proper use of the keyword? Will this > behavior be stable in the future? >
This is not an abuse of inline results, and this behavior _will_ be stable in the future. Another optional alias for #+resname: which may make more sense in this context is #+data: blah : blahcontent Best -- Eric -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/