Not at all.
Pierre
Le 8 juil. 11 à 09:36, Sebastien Vauban a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
Any objection for applying this patch?
Pierre de Buyl wrote:
I checked and indeed "content" is working well.
Pierre
Le 1 juil. 11 à 16:06, Sebastien Vauban a écrit :
Hi Pierre,
Pierre de Buyl wrote:
Le 28 juin 11 à 23:45, Sebastien Vauban a écrit :
Here is thus my proposition for a better div-structured HTML.
There are only four parts required in the HTML for all the
magic to work
with the CSS:
- The first part is a container div ("content", by default)
that surrounds
everything.
- Inside that are three more parts:
+ a preamble (in a div, if the user wants it),
+ a div "body" and
+ a postamble (in a div, if the user wants it).
I think my regular use of the html export would be broken.
We'll try to solve that, then.
I add a <div id="wrapper"> in the preamble and a </div> in the
postamble.
This allows me to make a "boxed" page (see
http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~pdebuyl/ ) which I like.
If I cannot end my div in the postamble, I think it would break
my setup.
Here is my setup:
:html-preamble "
<div id=\"wrapper\">
<div id=\"menu\">
HERE, some static menu items.
</div>
"
:html-postamble "
</div>
"
Why are you adding a `wrapper' div in the already existing
`content' div
(that
surrounds everything). I see no real difference between both.
I tried without that extra div and I cannot reproduce my former
layout.
Would you apply your CSS rule onto `content', would that make a
diff?
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban