Hi Philipp,
Philipp Haselwarter <philipp.haselwar...@gmx.de> writes:
> Is there any particular reason for it to be hardcoded? Apart from the
> fact that /well it just is this way right now/ I mean.
Nothing carved in stone, but here are the two reasons I see:
- we don't want users to use arbitrary regexp to match headlines as they
are very likely to shoot themselves in the foot (Harven's example of
using "-" instead of "*" is a good example of that.)
- Given this, I am not able to imagine a good way of limiting the number
of allowed characters.
> That'd be useful information for anyone interested in changing it.
I'd interested in any solution to the problems above.
> Then
> you can still just tell them to write a patch if they care that much
> ('cause even in org-mode-land patches don't write themselves just yet)
:)
> [I just had the most awesome idea for a feature request].
Please share!
> If it's "just" about inheriting from a variable in some 300 places it
> could at least be discussed.
Yep -- if you have the energy to go through the code and see where it is
hardcoded while it should not, please do.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
