Hi Marc-Oliver, Marc-Oliver Ihm <i...@online.de> writes:
> I would like to submit the new function org-find-timestamps for > disussion. Thanks for this piece of code and for this idea! I've tested it a bit and I encourage others to test it. I was able to create a sparse tree with inactive timestamps, but I was not able to display a buffer with ordered items. I will test more carefully and give feedback/debugging. My main reaction is: your idea/code could partially sneak into `org-sparse-tree' by adding a new ran[g]e option, asking the starting and ending dates, and creating the sparse tree. What do you think? -- Bastien
