Hi Bastien,

At Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:52:44 +0200,
Bastien wrote:
> :
> > I'm also think about cache in the calfw side, such as an alist:
> > (date . [a list of contents]). Then, uses can refresh the cache
> > explicitly. It is easy to implement.
> >
> > Is the plan(1) the same idea?
> 
> Yes, It's the same idea, but on Org's side.

I see. It sounds great.


> I'm focusing on bugfixes for the next release and cannot work 
> through the details of the implementation, but I keep thinking
> about it.

Ok. I also need a time to do other things.
Indeed, I have to write the document of calfw.

Regards,
--
SAKURAI, Masashi (family, given)
m.saku...@kiwanami.net

Reply via email to