Hi Suvayu, suvayu ali wrote: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Sebastien Vauban > <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> wrote: >>> Another idea would be to introduce another keyword like APPT an place >>> these time stamps also into the second line. That might be more easy to >>> implement. >> >> FWIW, my instinctive reaction would be: yes, great! Maybe that clarifies >> the bits around dates: all active dates get keywords, only inactive ones >> are without any keyword. > > Yes, this would be a nice addition. I always find it difficult to decide how > to put regular timestamps too.
By regular timestamps, you mean: inactive timestamps? Can you, maybe, comment on what makes the decision difficult? Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban