Michael Brand <michael.ch.br...@gmail.com> writes: > If the shell is a special case for babel anyway, why not something > like the following?
Ehm, no. But I think that it would be generally useful (not just for shell blocks) to be able to capture stderr, either together with stdout or separately into a result target block and have the return status available as a variable (although that does not work for consecutive invocations in a session). Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf rackAttack: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSounds
