Patch 913 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/913/) is now "Accepted".

Maintainer comment: none

This relates to the following submission:

http://mid.gmane.org/%3C1314282867-11165-1-git-send-email-sojka%40os.inf.tu-dresden.de%3E

Here is the original message containing the patch:

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Subject: [O] icalendar: Make alarm duration RFC5545 compliant
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:34:27 -0000
> From: Michal Sojka <so...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
> X-Patchwork-Id: 913
> Message-Id: <1314282867-11165-1-git-send-email-so...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
> To: b...@altern.org
> Cc: Michal Sojka <so...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>, cdomi...@newartisans.com,
>       emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> 
> * org-icalendar.el (org-print-icalendar-entries): Make alarm duration
> RFC5545 compliant.
> 
> The format of alarm trigger was incorrect because "T" letter from
> dur-time element was missing (see
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5545#section-3.3.6). This caused some
> software (such as KOrganizer) to not interpret the alarms correctly.
> 
> TINYCHANGE
> 
> ---
> lisp/org-icalendar.el |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lisp/org-icalendar.el b/lisp/org-icalendar.el
> index bc0efce..a3ea88e 100644
> --- a/lisp/org-icalendar.el
> +++ b/lisp/org-icalendar.el
> @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ When COMBINE is non nil, add the category to each line."
>         (let ((t1 (ignore-errors (org-parse-time-string ts 'nodefault))))
>           (if (and (> org-icalendar-alarm-time 0)
>                    (car t1) (nth 1 t1) (nth 2 t1))
> -             (setq alarm (format 
> "\nBEGIN:VALARM\nACTION:DISPLAY\nDESCRIPTION:%s\nTRIGGER:-P0D0H%dM0S\nEND:VALARM"
>  summary org-icalendar-alarm-time))
> +             (setq alarm (format 
> "\nBEGIN:VALARM\nACTION:DISPLAY\nDESCRIPTION:%s\nTRIGGER:-P0DT0H%dM0S\nEND:VALARM"
>  summary org-icalendar-alarm-time))
>             (setq alarm ""))
>           )
>         (if (string-match org-bracket-link-regexp summary)
> 

Reply via email to