Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: > >> but behaviour that I can accept, especially as the easy solution is to >> simply enclose the equation in a latex block: >> >> * equation with leading minus sign >> The following equation >> #+begin_latex >> \begin{equation} >> \label{eq:test} >> y = 3 x >> - 5 >> + 4 >> \end{equation} >> #+end_latex >> >> This works just fine and is probably for the best in any case. Using a >> latex block allows for latex specific editing (C-c '). Should have done >> this in the first place! > > Technically, this isn't the same. The LaTeX block would be removed > during an HTML export while the plain LaTeX code would be changed into > an image (or "Mathjaxified", whatever that means).
Agreed. For my use case, this is not a major issue, mind you, as my preferred export route is to PDF via LaTeX... > That's annoying because I tend to think that writing plain LaTeX > environments (without any block marker) should be deprecated. Again, agreed, but this will require a more general approach to the handling of e.g. latex blocks for export to other languages. Not easy, I would guess, unless we make more use of conversion to png for blocks. Thanks again, eric -- : Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1 : using Org-mode version 7.7 (release_7.7.284.g11de)