Hi Eric, Eric Schulte wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: >> Martyn Jago wrote: >>> "Sebastien Vauban" >>> <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: >>>> Loading /cygdrive/c/home/sva/src/org-mode/testing/lisp/test-ob-R.el >>>> (source)... >>>> peculiar error >> >> Just git pull'ed, and re-tested: >> >> ┏━━━━ >> ┃ Ran 111 tests, 104 results as expected, 7 unexpected (2011-09-26 >> 08:20:06+0200) >> ┃ >> ┃ 7 unexpected results: >> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/command-arguments >> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/fortran-var-program >> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/input-var >> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/list-var >> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/list-var-from-table >> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/preprosessor-var >> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/simple-program >> ┗━━━━ >> >> "Normal", I don't have any fortran installed. Maybe, some sort of protection >> should have to be applied to these too. > > I've just improved the code which checks for executables as the previous > version was probably linux-specific. The following should now throw an > error on your system which should inhibit loading of the fortran tests. > > (org-test-for-executable "gfortran")
New status: ┏━━━━ ┃ Ran 102 tests, 102 results as expected (2011-09-26 15:54:14+0200) ┗━━━━ Perfect... >>>> This is on Windows XP SP3, with a Cygwin Emacs (when run from terminal; >>>> otherwise, it is a Win32 binary from the FSF). >>> >>> Its really great to hear you are running the tests on Windows. At some >>> point I hope to test with the EmacsW32 port. >> >> I can do it as well. I should automate this -- not difficult, though. >> >> If there is some shared place to place such results, I can imagine running >> them every couple of hours (cron'ed), or so, and publish the resulting HTML. >> I >> could do this when being online, that is more or less half of the time. > > This sounds great. I agree that a public place to post results would be > useful. Also, while we don't have any HTML export right now, simply > redirecting the results of the test execution to a file should be > sufficient. We can put such in place. For Windows tests, it could be someone else, if someone promises to be 24/7 online -- what won't be my case. Otherwise, I'm willing to do it, simply know that there will be holes in the update of the results. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban