Hi Nick, Nick Dokos wrote: > Martyn Jago <martyn.j...@btinternet.com> wrote: > >> There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within >> Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg >> reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding >> edge (I tend to assume the latter because of the Org community spirit of >> Worg), but I fail to find any specific notice regarding this. >> >> Advice would be appreciated since I've found myself appreciating, and >> adding to Worg more and more - and it seems to me it is a real quality of >> Org that Worg can exist in the first place. >> > > Is there any way to find out what the org version is at the worg site? > This is something that I've wondered about in the past, but I keep > forgetting to ask the question. E.g. it would be good to know the > version, so when I make a change to worg content and test the change by > publishing the site locally, I can use the exact version that is going > to be used on the real site. Right now, I test with whatever version is > running on my machine, which can lead to false conclusions (both positive > and negative).
IIUC, the answer is no. But the best place for such information should be in the output log of the publish process, that is at http://orgmode.org/worg/publishing.txt Adding (message "Org-mode %s on Emacs %s." org-version emacs-version) -- or something alike -- in http://orgmode.org/worg/sources/emacs.el should do it. BTW, sorry, yes, the answer is yes: see section "What software is available on Worg for Babel code execution?" on http://orgmode.org/worg/worg-setup.html. But one can wonder if it's up-to-date. That's why adding it as proposed should be done anyway. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
