On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:07:41PM -0700, Eric Schulte wrote: > Rick Frankel <r...@rickster.com> writes: > > Turns out it was not that difficult to change this behavior. You and > Leo are both correct that in-buffer-order evaluation is more natural and > expected than the previous behavior. I've just pushed up a fix after > which evaluating the following >
Brillant! thank you Eric. This saves me much pain. rick
