On 11 January 2012 23:04, Michael Brand <michael.ch.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Phil > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 14:39, Phil (Philip) Mason > <phil.ma...@broadcom.com> wrote: > > Should I be able to use @> in references to remote tables? > > Yes, this issue has been resolved by Carsten with > release_7.7-420-g1432e4b > > I'm using org 7.8.03 but the issue is still there. > > Is there a syntax I should be using if I want to get all the entries > > in a table below a certain row without explicitly entering the > > number of the last row? > > The general solution for a Calc formula is e. g. with subvec as I > described here: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2011-11/msg00562.html > and in a similar sense as I described for subscr in the subsection > "Dynamic variation of ranges" here: > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-hacks.html#field-coordinates-in-formulas > > The general solution for a Lisp formula is e. g. with calc-subvector I > guess. > > The following simpler solution is only possible when the range is > relative to the field where the formula is evaluated in and when the > offset to the range border is static: > > |---+-----| > | a | abc | > | b | bcd | > | c | cde | > | d | | > | e | | > |---+-----| > #+TBLFM: @<$2..@>>>$2 = '(concat @0$1..@+2$1) > > With a remote table you can not use the simple solution. > > Michael > > As mentioned in my emails a while ago, @> still evaluates to the number of rows in the current table (from where the reference is being made) instead of the number of rows in the remote table being referenced. http://imgur.com/4W75H Sincerely, -- Sankalp
