On 2012-01-24 00:01 +0800, François Pinard wrote: > Commands `C-c .' and `C-c !' both insert a time stamp in the buffer, and > the date is prompted in the mini-buffer in the same way for both > commands. One of them is going to insert <DATE>, the other [DATE]. The > mini-buffer always show <DATE>, like this: > > Date+time [2012-01-23]: => <2012-01-23 lun> > > Could it be: > > Date+time [2012-01-23]: => [2012-01-23 lun]
I think this is a good suggestion. <> is unconditionally set in org-time-stamp-custom-formats but it can be fixed by tweaking org-read-date-display. Leo
