Hello, Rick Frankel <r...@rickster.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:58:26PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes: >> > Unless I miss something, if "num:*" would be allowed in addition to >> > integers, the LaTeX crowd would be pleased, no terribly new syntax would >> > be needed and all other backends could take note to skip numbering that >> > headline. Maybe one could throw in "nil" and "none" as an alias for >> > "*". >> >> I don't understand. What would "num:*" achieve? >> > > I think it's an attempt to be mnemonically similar to LaTeX -- > section* for an unnumbered section. I may be bold, but I still don't get it. "num:something" is a global option. We're talking about specifying _individually_ which headline wouldn't be numbered. How would a global option solve a local problem? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou
