Russell Adams <rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com> wrote: > > Nowadays, you can use (both on the LHS and the RHS of the formula) > > symbolic references relative to the first, second, third ... row like > > this: @<, @<<, @<< ... and relative to the last, penultimate, > > antepenultimate (is there such a word?) row like this: @>, @>>, @>>> > > ..., and similarly for columns, so you could write the formula, like > > this: > > > > #+TBLFM: > > @>>>$>=vsum(@-I..@-II);%.2f::@>>$>=@>>>$>*0.08;%.2f::@>$>=vsum(@-I..@-II);%.2f > > > > This *does* require iterated evaluations, so C-u C-u C-c C-c is your > > best bet, to make sure everything is updated properly. > > > > Nick > > What version was that introduced in? I know I haven't kept on the > bleeding edge, and I tried that just this past week and it didn't > work. I was hoping for it! >
It was introduced about a year ago, so it should be in 7.7 or later (possibly some earlier releases as well but I haven't checked in detail.) If you git, then the relevant commits are 5631a309ab567e0a6a059ce728f84c1637fd253f 3dd474575205d3808390fc6ea2d5feccdb3d4305 1432e4bc79f55ed21e8478284b6b7552736d0c22 The first two are the main ones - the last is a bug fix. Best bet is a fairly recent org (modulo all the git problems that people are trying to fix ATM). Nick
