On 23 Apr 2012 12:15, "Bastien" <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Hi Samuel, > > Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On 2012-04-20, John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> I've attached a small patch to the documentation that resolves a > >>>>> conflict between the manual's advice not to include timestamps in > >>>>> headlines and some of its examples where it does just that. > > > > Does this advice apply any more? > > Yes it does. > > > Perhaps it shoudl be removed. > > So no... let's stick to the current version of the manual.
Hi Bastien and all, I agree that the discouragement of timestamps in headlines should remain in the docs. But I still do think the docs examples should be changed to comply with that advice. I tried twice to send a patch, yet failed to do so in a manner recognized by patchwork. I *think* I know how now, but elected not to send a third attempt. Should I send it once again? Best, Brian vdB
