Eric Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes: > Eric Schulte <eric.schu...@gmx.com> writes: > >> Currently inline blocks like don't associate themselves with their >> results, they are only expected to be evaluated on export, so the >> functionality you suggest below would require first changing how results >> are associated with inline code blocks. >> >> Another option would be to hide everything but the body of the block, >> but this may be more confusing than it is worth. > > Eric, > > I do like what Torsten suggested a lot. I wonder if a halfway solution > would be possible. Define a babel: link type which includes the src_xxx > code and let the description part of the link be whatever the author > wants it to be. I wouldn't mind not knowing the result of the code > execution as I don't know that at the moment anyway. > > So, something like this would be nice: > > ... and the result is [[babel:src_octave{3*x+5}][f(x)]] which > demonstrates ... > > which would look like > > ... and the result is f(x) which demonstrates ... > > (with f(x) highlighted as a link). > > Could something like this be possible? > > And, to take this further, could the highlighting differ depending on > link type? I've not explored this latter aspect so maybe it's already > possible... >
I think both this and Torsten's original idea would both be nice options. Preferably the final solution would subsume either use case. Unfortunately either implementation would require a fairly significant amount of work on the inline source block system, work which I unfortunately do not have time for at the moment (although I'm happy to help if anyone else wants to jump into the code). Thanks, > > thanks, > eric -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/