Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> wrote:
>>
>> With that 4-th level (far from 6!), the compilation simply ends in error.
>>
>> Anyone understanding why this happens?
>
> Apparently the FAQ is wrong: 4 will compile, 5 will not - e.g. the following
> will not compile with my setup:
>
> \documentclass{article}
>
> \begin{document}
>
> \begin{itemize}
> \item foo
> \begin{itemize}
> \item bar
> \begin{itemize}
> \item baz
> \begin{itemize}
> \item hunoz
> \begin{itemize}
> \item hukerz
> \end{itemize}
> \end{itemize}
> \end{itemize}
> \end{itemize}
> \end{itemize}
> \end{document}
Confirmed...
> That's probably part of the explanation - the extra frame enclosing the
> nested list in your case might have something to do with the rest but that's
> purely a guess.
Then, yes, it seems that, somehow, the frametitle is eating 1 nesting level,
leaving just maximum 3 indentation levels for the lists.
One can say that 3 nesting levels is enough for slides (even if the above was
a real case: compiling slides from a colleague), so don't spend time on trying
to understand was the limit is 3 and not 4 levels (and not 6, as falsely
adverted in the FAQ).
Thanks for your help.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
