Hello Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Andreas Leha <andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes: >>>> >>>> Ideally, in my opinion, the LaTeX-exporter would honor the >>>> "#+LANGUAGE: XX" >>>> setting and change the babel-settings accordingly >>> >>> That seems reasonable. Is there any translation table between language >>> symbols and Babel options? >> >> Not that I am aware of. But we could start one quite easily. I got this >> list of LaTeX-babel supported languages from >> http://www.tug.org/texlive/Contents/live/texmf-dist/doc/generic/babel/babel.pdf: >> (just a quick hack...) > > The following patch should add the language option according to LANGUAGE > keywords if babel package is explicitly loaded in preamble.
I think this will be a great addition! > Is it what you had in mind? I'm a bit reluctant to load babel package if > not present. At first sight, I had no particular opinion about whether it's better to load or not Babel by default. After thinking about it, I think you're right NOT loading it by default. Babel plays with cat codes for `:' among others, and can conflict with isodate IIRC. Hence, better let the user decide to really include it or not. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
