On 25.06.2012 13:35, Toby Cubitt wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:52:41PM +0200, Toby Cubitt wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:39:08PM +0200, Bastien wrote: >>> Hi Toby, >>> >>> Toby Cubitt <ts...@cantab.net> writes: >>> >>>> For some unknown reason, org-mode is causing the undo boundary between >>>> the (2 . 4) and (1 . 2) entries to be removed from `buffer-undo-list'. >>> >>> Can you try again with >>> >>> (setq org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo nil) >>> >>> and report? >> >> Yup, that fixes the problem. >> >> I don't fully understand the purpose of >> `org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo', given that the Emacs command loop >> already groups consecutive undo entries together, but presumably it >> enables a more aggressive form of clustering.
Just to clarify this little piece here: I originally introduces this clustering code to mimic emacs' behavior in text mode. Org-mode's aggressive interception seemed to prevent that and undoing in org-mode felt unnatural compared to vanilla text mode. It was never meant to be *more* aggressive than emacs' original behavior. The grouping did not happen at the time. The original thread is here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2009-02/msg00691.html Martin
