Hi Giovanni, On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:14:43PM +0100, Giovanni Ridolfi wrote: > > > org-toodledo effectively does: > > (require 'org) > > Then uses the variable org-version. > > This has worked just fine for a few years, but > > ... but since few months the place where org-version is defined has changed > from org.el > to org-version.el > that is generated during compilation IIRC (!) If I'm wrong Achim Gratz > will correct me. >
I think the change you mention above is transparent to both the end-user and thrid-party packages. It should be immaterial here. Of course Achim should correct me if I'm wrong. :) > > It seems wrong to me that hacking org-toodledo is the appropriate > > solution. > I disagree. > > Would you please try to add (require 'org-install) instead of (require > 'org) and see if org-toodledo works? > The (require 'org-install) bit is supposed to be user code, specific for each installation; it is highly dependent on the load-path. IMO, the problem here is the OP[1] has a mixed installation and neither org or org-toodledo needs any fix. There are many discussions about mixed installations in the archive and Worg. It would be worthwhile if the OP went through this one in particular: <http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#mixed-install>. Hope this helps, Cheers, PS: I wish there was a canonical way to diagnose mixed installs. :-| Footnotes: [1] I forgot who it was, sorry. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.