Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes: > Bastien writes: >> Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes: >>> That would be commit 830a0781a6 by Jambunathan, then. Autoloads really >>> don't work that way, so could this please be reverted? >> >> Done. > > Thank you. > > By way of explanation: autoload knows about a handful of "special" > constructs. If you put an autoload cookie on any other sexp, it will be > copied verbatim into the autoload file. This comes in handy sometimes, > but the sexp may not make any sense in that context…
Yes. On top of that, I think these functions do not need to be autoloaded anyway. -- Bastien
