Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes: > Bastien writes: >> Do you mean this should be (random) instead of (random t) in those >> versions? Why? If so, we can simply get rid of the compatibility >> macro and use (random). > > Do you mind if I revert that commit and implement the change?
Absolutely not, on the contrary. Thanks in advance, PS: I've been busy today with some Emacs issues I thought would take less time. And I've been busy with the website last week, it always take more time than it seems... and maybe deserves. But I'm back focusing on Org. -- Bastien
