Bastien <b...@altern.org> wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > > > Well, the non-interactiveness and the next day are because the four > > items I marked were the last four items for that date, so after marking > > them, the cursor happened to be on the date line for the next day, which > > apparently is taken as an indication that I want things to be > > rescheduled for that date, no questions asked. Not sure I like this > > much. > > This implementation was to mimick the previous behavior we had with > `k m' (to mark an entry) then `k s' (to schedule it to the date at > point with no prompt.) > > I don't like having no prompt here too. > > I just changed the behavior so that there is *always* a prompt > with `m m m B s' -- if the cursor is on a date, this date is the > default time for the prompt, RET will reschedule to this date. >
Thanks - this sounds much better. I hope Greg likes it too. I ran a bunch of things past it and it worked perfectly (imo of course). > > However, if I move the cursor off the date line before I issue the > > bulk command, I get a date dialog, but it's a no-op: no matter what > > I give it, things are rescheduled to today. > I also turned the time grid back on in the agenda and that's working without errors too. Thanks! Nick