Hi Seb,
"Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org> writes: > Hi Bastien, > > Bastien wrote: >> this is to advertize two small modifications wrt source blocks >> processing. >> >> 1) Please use ":results drawer" instead of ":results wrap" to insert >> results like this: >> >> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results drawer >> (message "a") >> #+END_SRC >> >> #+RESULTS: >> :RESULTS: >> a >> :END: > > OK. That name is clearly better! > >> 2) Support for ":results org" has been removed. > > Why don't we have anymore "#+begin/end_org" blocks while we still have > "#+begin_html" and "#+begin_LaTeX" blocks? Org as the language seemed normal > to insert blocks in Org-syntax. > > How will Org constructs be supported, for example headlines in the old > "#+begin/end_org" blocks -- with the "," used for protecting the export? > > #+begin_src org > ,* This is an headline > ,This is some text. > #+end_src > >> You can either insert the results with ":results raw" or "results drawer" >> if you need to tell the exporter to include/exclude the results (by >> including/excluding the :RESULTS: drawer from export.) > > Will ":RESULTS:" drawers be included by default, to mimic the current support > of "#+begin/end_org" blocks? > > Best regards, > Seb :results org was a synonym for :results raw, so I think "small change" here probably means that support for the synonym was dropped. #+begin/end_org blocks should still work with the :wrap header argument, which hasn't been altered, IIUC. All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com