Hi Eric, > Andreas Leha <andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am getting different results from the evaluation of a source block and >> the evaluation of a #+call line to that block. >> >> Therefore, my question: Is there an equivalent to >> org-babel-expand-src-block (C-c C-v v) for #+call lines? >> >> Or more general: How do I debug #+call lines? >> >> Regards, >> Andreas >> > > Can you provide a minimal example? > > You could write a code block equivalent to the call line. E.g., > > #+call: foo(bar=1) > > is equivalent to > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var results=foo(bar=1) > results > #+end_src
Thanks for following this up. I found the problem in my case: The header argument ':colnames yes' was missing from the call line, such that the passed variables were different. (I've fallen into that trap repeatedly, but do not learn, as it seems...) It would have been a lot easier to find this, if I had had the possibility to do C-c C-v v on the call line to get the chance to step through the (R-) code that is evaluated. Without this, it took me some time to figure things out. So the question still stands: Is there the possibility to see what is actually executed with a call line, similar to C-c C-v v on a source block? For a small example consider: --- #+name: foo | bar | | baz | | bam | #+call: testblock[:var a=foo]() :colnames yes #+name: testblock #+begin_src R :var a=foo :colnames yes a <- a[,1] data.frame(x=a) #+end_src --- Regards, Andreas
