Christopher Schmidt <christop...@ch.ristopher.com> wrote: > Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> writes: > > In any case, if you can get rid of the let-bind (or the need to muck > > with TeX-master at all within org), without introducing a regression, > > we are all ears. > > I think adding (require 'tex nil t) before the let form is a nice fix. >
Not really: you end up pulling in auctex even if you are not going to use it. > IMO the situation ATM is pretty bad. If AUCTeX is not loaded pre export > the missing variable definition breaks AUCTeX completely. > What missing variable definition? By the time the export is finished, the let-bind is gone. There is no definition of TeX-master anywhere, just as if you never had org loaded: why should auctex object to that? So I don't understand why it would break: all the common scenarios that I have tried work with no problem for me. I can load an org file, export to latex, open the latex file (which loads auctex) and do auctex things to it. I don't get any error. What exactly do I have to do in order to break it? Nick
