Hi, thanks for this syntax. 2012/11/10 Memnon Anon <gegendosenflei...@googlemail.com>
> requirement 1 and 3 would be something like this: > > DEADLINE: <2012-11-11 So ++2w -2d> > > , a repeated task with an explicit deadline for the item. > > Regarding 2, the setting to DONE automatically bit: > May I ask, why you consider that? It doesn't seem really > useful to me; a status change, purely based on time, does not convey any > information whatsoever afaict. > > In this special issue I have to do a report every two weeks and the agenda should only remember myself; in case the date passed, it doesn't matter: the status should change for a fortnight to DONE I don't want to have list of items in the agenda, which are always done and I have to change manually the status. ukhara
