Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes:
> Getting rid of special cased machinery to provide a more general one
> counts as simplification in my book.
Unless I'm mistaken, current set-up can generate any preamble. Then, how
could it be special cased and how could another system be more general?
I agree that current system is far from being perfect. Some other system
may even be more convenient to use. But I won't buy that it will be
simpler.
My judgment may be clouded because I think some other parts of the
exporter deserve a more immediate attention, though.
>> Also, if you want to add package collections, you may include
>> a header-only file in your class, I guess.
>
> I don't get what you are telling me here, sorry.
You can have "\input{my-special-headers-A.tex}" somewhere in your class,
where "my-special-headers-A.tex" file contains some package collection.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
