Hi Achim, Bastien, org-developers, * Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> [28. Dec. 2012]: > Am 28.12.2012 14:36, schrieb Gregor Zattler: >>I use option `hidestars' and Emacs/org-mode on a terminal with >>black background. Since a few days the superflous stars are not >>hidden any more but shown on a white background. This makes them >>stand out very much. > > I don't see how this change is related since it changes the > foreground, not the background. What do the following things return > if you eval them in the org buffer (with M-: since they are not > interactive):
I don't know if it's essential to this tests if the commit in question is applied or not so I do this two times: first line is for Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-890-g9cf680 @ /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/) (--> patch reverted; stars are hidden) second line is for Org-mode version 7.9.2 (release_7.9.2-877-ge6d8ed @ /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/) (--> with Bastiens patch, stars with white background) > (face-background 'default nil 'default) "unspecified-bg" "unspecified-bg" > (face-foreground 'default nil 'default) "unspecified-fg" "unspecified-fg" > (face-background 'org-hide nil 'default) "unspecified-bg" "unspecified-bg" > (face-foreground 'org-hide nil 'default) "black" "unspecified-bg" (yes: "-bg") This is on a customised rxvt-unicode with (among others) the following command line options: -tn rxvt-unicode-256color -fg white -bg black It's the same on uncustomised xterm. Ciao, Gregor -- -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-
