Michael, Michael Alan Dorman wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" <wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> writes: >> Or a feature, with the consequence that you should put those refs as comments >> (with the appropriate syntax in your language). > > That is an excellent suggestion for resolving my immediate issue that > had not occured to me at all. It believe it does mean that the > presentation of the code ends up with seemingly empty comments where the > coderefs were, but that's a relatively minor thing.
Glad it helped! >> But, yes, those comments stay as well in your tangled code, which you may not >> like. > > It seems counter-intuitive to me that text that is regarded as > meta-information when rendering for presentation is not treated > similarly when tangling---a needless mismatch between the two processes. I'll let Eric answer on this... > But thanks for your workaround suggestion, I will definitely take > advantage of it. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
